This VICE article delves into a surprising twist in El Chapo’s legal saga, where his defense team argues that an interview with a juror conducted by VICE should warrant a new trial. The article examines the claims made by El Chapo’s lawyers, who contend that the juror’s revelations indicate possible misconduct and bias that could have influenced the trial’s outcome. It provides context on the original trial and the juror’s statements, exploring the potential legal ramifications and the procedural hurdles involved in seeking a retrial. The piece offers a detailed look at the ongoing efforts of El Chapo’s defense to challenge his conviction, highlighting the complexities and contentious nature of high-profile criminal cases.
View the full article